Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) provide biological plausibility and energy efficiency, yet systematic investigations of memory augmentation strategies remain limited. We conduct a five-model ablation study integrating Leaky Integrate-and-Fire neurons, Supervised Contrastive Learning (SCL), Hopfield networks, and Hierarchical Gated Recurrent Networks (HGRN) on the N-MNIST dataset. Baseline SNNs exhibit organized neuronal groupings, or structured assemblies, characterized by a silhouette score of $0.687 \pm 0.012$. Individual augmentations introduce trade-offs: SCL improves accuracy by $0.28\%$ but reduces clustering (silhouette score $0.637 \pm 0.015$), while HGRN yields consistent gains in both accuracy ($+1.01\%$) and computational efficiency ($170.6\times$). Full integration achieves a balanced improvement across metrics, reaching a silhouette score of $0.715 \pm 0.008$, classification accuracy of $97.49 \pm 0.10\%$, energy consumption of $1.85 \pm 0.06\,μ\mathrm{J}$, and sparsity of $97.0\%$. These results indicate that optimal performance emerges from architectural balance rather than isolated optimization, establishing design principles for memory-augmented neuromorphic systems.